For the past five years I have been researching and collecting information regarding water fluoridation. I finally got to the point where I felt I had what I needed. I finally put this blog together regarding “water fluoridation.” My site is unique in that I don’t waste a lot of time debating their science as it is half truths and outright lies.
In fact a lot of the science we trust and believe in, is corporate science, which is bought and paid for by corporation to ensure profits at all cost.
Some may ask why I am using information from the USA. The reason being is that water fluoridation got it’s beginnings there. The science comes from there and the water fluoridation product comes from there. The whole concept was started there and exported to other countries.
I will let the doctors and scientists speak their truth.
MUCH OF WHAT MEDICAL RESEARCHERS CONCLUDE IN THEIR STUDIES IS MISLEADING, EXAGGERATED OR FLAT-OUT WRONG!
David Freedman, The Atlantic.com
So why are doctors—to a striking extent—still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice? Dr. John Ioannidis has spent his career challenging his peers by exposing their bad science.
Indeed, given the breadth of the potential problems raised at the meeting, can any medical-research studies be trusted?
A shocking admission by the editor of the world’s most respected medical journal, The Lancet, is saying that medical research is UNRELIABLE AT BEST IF NOT COMPLETELY BOGUS! Lancet editor, Richard Horton “… states bluntly that major pharmaceutical companies falsify or manipulate tests on the health, safety and effectiveness of their various drugs by taking samples too small to be statistically meaningful or hiring test labs or scientists where the lab or scientist has blatant conflicts of interest such as pleasing the drug company to get further grants.”
The editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.
In her must-read essay, Dr. Angell skewers drug companies, university medical departments, and medical groups which set the criteria for diagnosis and treatment as being rotten with corruption and conflicts of interest.
And we’ve previously documented that the government sometimes uses raw power to cover up corruption in the medical and scientific fields.
Former vice President of Pfizer, Dr. Peter Rost, has blown the whistle on the dangers of the Gardasil vaccine – and claims that Big Pharma aims to keep people unhealthy.
In 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University, published the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.
Unless an individual spends the time to educate themselves they will never get that. Most will be dumbfounded by the whole fluoride debate and ask, but why would they do that. Most still have this blind trust in government.
My goal is to show people how we have all been duped and that is my primary focus. We have all been lied too by a corrupt few, who have been bought out by corporate interest for money as you will see in the information below. And this just doesn’t apply to water fluoridation. The lies and corruption are everywhere.
This is an excerpt from the article at the link above. It is a must read for everyone.
Just how Much Protection are Government “Regulators” Providing?
According to Dr. Chopra’s 35 years of experience as a scientist fighting to protect the public health in Canada – not much!
Corrupt to the Core is a fascinating commentary on the entire system of drug approvals, and how the system originally designed to protect the public health, whether in the US or Canada, has been hopelessly corrupted by corporate money and corporate cronyism that views industry as the “client” instead of the public.
Again and again, we see this repeating pattern: when concerned scientists who really understand the issues voice their concerns, they’re oftentimes fired or overruled by bureaucrats holding MBA’s. According to Dr. Chopra:
“Non-technical people, accountants, lawyers, and MBAs and all kinds of people were appointed as our bosses; who didn’t want to listen [to our scientific findings]. That was the style. MBAs can buy science and scientists don’t know how to manage science. That was the trend. It all came out of Harvard — the idea of how to manage scientific areas and health areas.
That is part of the corruption that began a long time ago. It was triggered out of the United States, particularly the Harvard model; everybody has to be an MBA. Doctors are sidelined, the scientists are sidelined, and engineers are sidelined… It will be those accountants and MBAs who will make the decisions.”
Scientists are dismissed because they interfere with the collusion between government and these large multinational corporations whose primary intent is to increase their profits – not to serve the public health.
The Canadian system is perhaps even worse than the US, as Canada only performs paper verification and doesn’t do any testing of their own on these products, which the US has the capacity to do.
Either way, the regulatory system we now have in the US and in Canada is a well greased, politically run operation where companies are NOT required to prove the safety and efficacy of their product in peer-reviewed scientific literature.
All they have to do is manipulate the regulatory authorities to approve their product, and they can then use that approval as proof and documentation — rather than the actual science — that their product is declared safe! Then they have plausible deniability for any health catastrophes that follow, since they can just blame the government for giving them approval.
If you think you deserve better protection than this from your government, then I encourage you to make your voice heard. As long as the masses stay silent on this subject, the systemic silencing of government scientists is guaranteed to continue…….
According to Dr. Chopra, corruption is not only systemic in the regulatory process, it’s also infected the judicial branch of government; and it’s now threatening to infect all corners of the globe. And this corruption is leading to very real public health consequences.
In Dr. Chopra’s words:
“[Recently] the United States Supreme Court said that if people get damaged, if the children get damaged due to vaccine, they can’t sue either the government or the companies — by what right?
Who is to decide to shove vaccines into people who don’t want it?
Who decides what food they should eat, whether it’s GMO or contaminated with all those toxic products: antibiotics, and GMO’s and pesticides and slaughterhouse waste?
Seventy-six million people in the United States get food-borne infections every year. About 5000 people die. In Canada, 11 million people, 1/3 of the population every year gets acute food-borne disease. Nobody talks about chronic food-borne disease; diabetes, obesity, heart attacks. All those things that are happening and nobody seems to care.
…Corruption is now hitting us all over. Every country is involved in this.
The U.S. has passed this bill, 510. Canada has passed a similar bill. India is passing a similar bill. They are even saying that if you criticize a government approved product without your own proof, you go to jail.”
To read more about Dr. Chopra’s battles as a scientist against the corrupting influence of corporations seeking to maximize their profits at the expense of public health, please read his newest book Corrupt to the Core.
Corrupt to The Core
Memoirs of a Health Canada Whistleblower by Shiv Chopra.
In a word incredible!
As a short introduction here is a 9 minute CBC interview.
This long awaited book is sure to be ignored by the mainstream media. In it is proof, that shows how our public servants, education, institutions etc. have slowly but surely been usurped by the industry interests. It really puts into focus the words of, J. Edgar Hoover – FBI Director’s, classic quote:
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that he cannot believe it exists”
Explained in great detail here, is what really happens in the bowels of the government, for some this write up may appear as preaching to the informed, however, this book will still boggle the mind of even the most hardened skeptic. An education Par Excellence!
Health Canada, and I suspect all governmental regulatory bodies, more or less are usurped and essentially owned by the industry. Instead of scientists, Health Canada’s upper management is now stacked with industry public relations men. A good account is made of how our science based institutions have been systematically overhauled into industry organs while maintaining the pretence of protecting the public…. Surely, under these circumstances one can never be safe given that the fox is guarding the hens…
Copious evidence is presented on how the upper management of our regulatory bodies have became handmaidens of the lobbyists, through coercion and bribery. Examples for such, are cases of scientists whose knowledge on the issue was too hard to succumb to the industry spin. Even more troubling are the shills who stick like molasses to the industry directives putting, not only their own families, but the whole country for sale!
Those who thought that this could not happen here will either go into denial or suffer the consequences, sadly these will extend to their children, grand children and more…. Unfortunately, this could only happen through the illiterate puppets and/or politicians who are too greedy to understand what they are doing? Many don’t even read/know what they are approving!
The book clearly puts into focus the real impetus on what is behind the current vogue of:
Review By David Hutton
“Corrupt to the Core” paints a disturbing picture of the internal machinations of a government regulator bent on pleasing its drug company ‘clients’, often with scant concern for the public health implications.
Dr. Shiv Chopra is one of three Health Canada scientists whose testimony before a Senate Committee in 1998 triggered headlines around the world. The scientists testified that Health Canada managers had pressured them to release suspect veterinary drugs into the food chain without the evidence of safety required by the Food and Drugs Act.
Read the full review here
Review by Michael Gilbertson, PhD
The North American Way of Doing Business.
As Abraham Lincoln said in 1864 during the American Civil War, “As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow”. On the front cover of Dr. Shiv Chopra’s book is a photograph of the Canadian Parliament Buildings and emblazoned in the sky and across the Peace Tower is the audacious title, Corrupt to the Core. In the early part of the last century, this same Parliament gave Canadians the Food and Drug Act to protect human health from adulterated food and to ensure Drug efficacy and safety. During the past ten years, Dr. Shiv Chopra has become a household name in Canada for his attempts to uphold the policies of the Food and Drug Act and its regulations. Within a week of Paul Martin narrowly winning the 2004 general election, Dr. Chopra and two other Health Canada colleagues, Dr. Margaret Haydon and Dr. Gerard Lambert, were fired after decades of opposing the use of antibiotics and hormones in food production.
Read the full review here
Here is Dr. Chopra’ website
It comes down to this
“Money makes the world go round,
money talks and people/science can be bought”
If you put your beliefs aside and really examine how the world works, you will find where there is big money involved, that money rules over human health and the environment most of the time and I will show this to you, here.
I can give you other examples, but will provide you below, with one clear case where scientist were paid to provide an outcome to benefit the sugar industry at the expense of our health.
As early as the 1960s, the sugar industry knew- because of research that had been done- that there was a possibility sugar played a role in heart disease. And they never said a word, in fact, they blamed fat.
According to newly uncovered documents, in the 1960s the sugar industry began funding research to cast doubt on sugar’s role in heart disease, mainly by pointing the finger at fat instead. A recently published analysis based on correspondence between a sugar trade group and researchers from Harvard University clearly demonstrates how food and beverage makers actively shape the public’s understanding of nutrition for their own financial gain.
In 1964, the group now known as the Sugar Association internally discussed a campaign to address “negative attitudes toward sugar” after studies began emerging linking sugar with heart disease, according to documents dug up from public archives. The following year the group approved “Project 226,” which entailed paying Harvard researchers today’s equivalent of $48,900 US for an article reviewing the scientific literature, supplying materials they wanted reviewed, and receiving drafts of the article. The resulting article published in 1967 concluded there was “no doubt” that reducing cholesterol and saturated fat was the only dietary intervention needed to prevent heart disease. The researchers overstated the consistency of the literature on fat and cholesterol, while downplaying studies on sugar, according to the analysis.Here is one more.
Here we have wireless phone industry skewing information to make phones appear to be safe.
Can we always trust doctors and dentist endorsements?
Where fluoridation is concerned this information is relevant to most everyone, even if you have no fluoride in your city water. Almost all of the food chain is contaminated by fluoride, as most processed foods and drinks are made of fluoridated water, as well a lot of fruits and vegetables are sprayed with fluoride based pesticides.
In this article Dr. Foulkes explains how he was duped, as well he speaks about how dangerous fluoride really is.
I am Dr. Richard Foulkes. I am an M.D., a health care administrator and former assistant professor in the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology at the University of British Columbia, Canada. I was, also, in the 1970’s, a special consultant to the Minister of Health of British Columbia and commissioned by the Government to study the health care system of that province. …..
……We are brought up to respect these persons in whom we have placed our trust to safeguard the public interest. It is difficult for each of us to accept that these may be misplaced. The studies that were presented to me were selected and showed only positive results. Studies that were in existence at that time that did not fit the concept that they were “selling,” were either omitted or declared to be “bad science.” The endorsements had been won by coercion and the self interest of professional elites. Some of the basic “facts” presented to me were, I found out later, of dubious validity.
……I know now that I was presented with what has been called “the tainted truth.”….
Fluoride is more toxic than lead!
Dr. John Colquhoun, Principle Dental Officer for the City of Aukland, New Zealand was an articulate and successful proponent of water fluoridation for many years throughout New Zealand. After a world study tour and examining carefully complete statistics for New Zealand he found that there were fewer cavities and more children ages 12-13 cavity free in the non-fluoridated part of New Zealand. He re-examined the statistics, called colleagues all over the world, and reviewed large-scale studies. In 1997 he came to the conclusion that water fluoridation had little or no effect on cavity prevention but had health consequences. His careful review of the data showed a decline in tooth decay since the 1930’s before any fluoride products were used. It was felt that improved nutrition, which has been well described, contributed to the improved dental health (68, 69, 70)
Why I Changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation
Dr. John Colquhoun
To explain how I came to change my opinion about water fluoridation, I must go back to when I was an ardent advocate of the procedure. I now realise that I had learned, in my training in dentistry, only one side of the scientific controversy over fluoridation. I had been taught, and believed, that there was really no scientific case against fluoridation, and that only misinformed lay people and a few crackpot professionals were foolish enough to oppose it. I recall how, after I had been elected to a local government in Auckland (New Zealand’s largest city, where I practised dentistry for many years and where I eventually became the Principal Dental Officer) I had fiercely — and, I now regret, rather arrogantly — poured scorn on another Council member (a lay person who had heard and accepted the case against fluoridation) and persuaded the Mayor
and majority of my fellow councillors to agree to fluoridation of our water supply.
AFFIDAVIT OF DR. JOHN COLQUHOUN … Dr. John Colquhoun, being first duly sworn on oath and with personal knowledge of the information contained herein, …
“Doctoring” of Data
7. I was shocked to discover, when the statistics were sent to me, they revealed
no such benefit. In fact, in most Health Districts the percentage of children
who were “caries-free” was higher in the non-fluoridated areas than in the
fluoridated areas. I disagreed sharply with my superiors’ action in circulating
a document, “overview of fluoridation statistics,” which omitted the above
information, disgracefully “doctored” the remaining statistics, and claimed
that a marginal benefit existed.
8. When, in addition, I discovered that dental fluorosis prevalences (a sign of
fluoride toxicity) were much higher than expected in fluoridated areas, I
publicly changed my stance on fluoridation in 1983.
9. I have continued my research, which gained me a Doctor of Philosophy
degree in 1987, and appointment to the post-doctoral position of Honorary
Research Fellow of the University of Auckland. Last year (1992) I became
editor of the Journal of the International Society for Fluoride Research
(Fluoride), a position which provides a good overview of fluoride research
in different academic disciplines
Here are affidavits from other doctors and scientist.
We are told fluoride is “safe and effective” yet
The Merk Veterinary Manual states that “FLUORIDE IS A CELLULAR POISON”
Particularly worth noting is the statement of Richard A. Kunin, M.D. regarding fluoride exposure and disease burdens when he stated
“the background (fluoride exposure) from all sources is increasing to such an extent that everyone with chronic medical symptoms has to consider fluoride as a probable cause, even before nutrient imbalance.”
Former Environmental Protection Agency Scientists and whistle blowers state:
Dr. Robert Carton, Ph.D, (20 years), EPA risk assessment scientist
“The level of fluoride the government allows the public is based on scientifically fraudulent information and altered reports. People can be harmed simply by drinking water.”
William Hirzy, PhD former chief chemist for the EPA and former President of the Union of Professional Employees of the EPA – “Sodium fluoride is a registered rat poison and roach poison. It has been a protected pollutant for a very long time.”
Dr. William Marcus, Ph.D, former chief toxicologist at the EPA – “Fluoride is a carcinogen by any standard we use. I believe the EPA should act immediately to protect the public, not just on the cancer data, but on the evidence of bone fractures, arthritis, mutagenicity, and other effects.”
In this revealing documentary, all three scientist speak about the fraud that has been orchestrated on us all
Dr. Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus, U.S. National Cancer Institute.
One in Five Cancer Deaths Linked to Water Fluoridation
–Dr. Dean Burk
Yiamouyiannis and Burk published epidemiology studies that have since been revised twice (3), by Burk (former head of the Cytochemistry section at NIH). In these extensively peer reviewed papers, the authors found that about 10,000 deaths a year are attributable to fluoride water treatment. The U.S. Public Health Service (U.S.PHS) criticized the original studies by erroneously asserting that the results reported by the authors were a result of changes in the age, race and sex composition of the sample. The U.S.PHS made mathematical errors and did not include 90% of the data. U.S.PHS method of analysis when applied to the database, confirmed that 10,000 excess cancer deaths yearly were linked to fluoridation of water supplies. This evidence has been tested most recently in the Pennsylvania Courts and found scientifically sound after careful scrutiny.
In 1937, Dean became a co-founder of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), and headed its Cytochemistry department for over three decades.
Dean was initially skeptical that there was any link between fluoridation and cancer but later came to believe ardently that fluoride was a major carcinogen, responsible for tens of thousands of deaths per year. With his NCI credentials, he was the most impressive witness the anti-fluoridation forces around the world had. Needless to say, this role did not endear him to the public health establishment, which fought for its right to medicate the entire public with fluoride in the public drinking water in the name of preventing tooth decay among children.
“In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster than any other chemical.”–Dean Burk – Congressional Record 21 July 1976
“More people have died in the last 30 years from cancer connected with fluoridation than all the military deaths in the entire history of the United States.”
– Dean Burk, PhD National Cancer Institute–Fluoridation:A Burning Controversy
“I know of absolutely no, and I mean absolutely no means of prevention that would save so many lives as simply to stop fluoridation, or don’t start it where it is otherwise going to be started. There you might save 30,000 or 40,000 or 50,000 lives a year, cancer lives. That is an awful lot of lives a year.” Dr. Dean Burk Ph.D. (34 years at the National Cancer Institute). Judicial hearing, January 14, 1982.Safe Water Foundation vs. City of Houston, District Court of Texas, Harris County, 151st Judicial District, 80-52271
Dr. Dean Burk co-authored one of the most frequently cited papers in the history of biochemistry, “The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constants,” published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society in 1934.
” When you have power you don’t have to tell the truth. That’s a rule that’s been working in this world for generations. There are a great many people who don’t tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions. ”
“How can anyone calculate a child’s total fluoride exposure when there are unknown amounts of fluoride in virtually all the foods we eat, mainly because they are processed with fluoridated water,” lawyer Paul Beeber, president of the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation.
“Mottled and brittle teeth,”Dr. Limeback told me. “In Canada we are now spending more money treating dental fluorosis than we do treating cavities. That includes my own practice.” Dr. Hardy Limeback, biochemist and Professor of Dentistry, University of Toronto
Excerpt of a letter submitted by: Dr. James Beck, MD, M.D., Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Medical Biophysics, University of Calgary at the meeting City of Calgary Council Chambers. Wednesday January 26, 2011.
“Now what kind of ethical consciousness allows one to continue to apply a possibly harmful process to unwilling people until there is absolute proof that it is harmful? I have seen this backward approach to safety in government reports on fluoridation. It goes like this: this study that shows association of fluoridation with this harmful effect is not a perfect study; there are weaknesses; therefore we will continue the process until it is shown with certainty that it is harmful. And no further research is recommended; no responsibility to support a better study is accepted. In the presence of a small and dubious benefit such a conclusion, more than being irresponsible, is outlandish. You don’t have the moral right to do this to us, to one million people. You should stop it now.”
“FLUORIDATION IS ILLEGAL” – “It is a civil battery and a criminal assault to give 12.2% or more of our children noticeably disfigured teeth.” says James Robert Deal, Attorney
This assault on our children needs to end.
” If you do nothing the nothing will happen”
“Ignorance is not bliss. It is how we are all being used and abused” .
United States Environmental Protection Agency scientists take court action against EPA for failing to protect public health
Dr. David Kennedy discusses the connection between fluoride in drinking water and cancer. He illustrates a number of studies that have been falsified to show no connection between the two. Also find out where this country gets its fluoride and how. You might be shocked to know how it’s produced. Enough is Enough
– It’s time to put an end to the Fraud of Artificial Fluoridation
After eight weeks of trial proceedings, the jury found unanimously that Monsanto’s glyphosate-based Roundup weed killer caused Mr. Johnson to develop NHL, and that Monsanto failed to warn of this severe health hazard. Importantly, the jury also found that Monsanto acted with malice, oppression or fraud and should be punished for its conduct.
Monsanto Co. continues to refuse to warn consumers of the dangers of its multi-billion-dollar product Roundup despite the world’s foremost authority on cancer—the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)—listing glyphosate as a probable carcinogen in 2015.
Lee Johnson is one of more than 4,000 people from across the country to file suit against Monsanto in state and federal courts based on allegations linking Roundup to cancer.
“We’ve got a network of evil in this country that we can’t hide from any longer.”—Fluoride the Aging Factor by John Yiamouyiannis
“In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other chemical.” Dr. Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus, U.S. National Cancer Institute
In Dr. Dean Burk’s own words;
“this amounts to public murder on a grand scale, it is a public crime, it would be, to put fluoride in the drinking water of people”.
“It is some of the most conclusive scientific and biological evidence that I have come across in my 50 years in the field of cancer research.”
“When you have power you don’t have to tell the truth. That’s a rule that’s been working in this world for generations. And there are a great many people who don’t tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions.”—Dean Burk former head of National Cancer Institute Research (interview on the Owen Spahn Talk Show, San Francisco, June 1972)
“They (ACS) lie like scoundrels.”–—Dean Burk, Ph.D., 34 years at the National Cancer Institute (Peter Barry Chowka, “The Cancer Charity Rip-Off,” East West Journal, July 1978)
“Such letters…from the FDA, are, filled with objectively demonstrable lies, practiced deceptions and deviousness, red herrings, directed misinformation, misdirected information, etc. …Once FDA-NCI-AMA-ACS…concedes that Laetrile anti-tumor efficacy was indeed even once observed…a permanent crack in bureaucratic armor has taken place.” – Dr. Dean Burke, co-founder, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cyto-chemistry section: open letter July 3, 1973.
Dr Dean Burk, who has spent more than fifty years in cancer research, mainly at the National Cancer Institute states: ‘More people have died in the last thirty years from cancer connected with fluoridation than all the military deaths in the entire history of the United States.’
“I know of absolutely no, and I mean absolutely no means of prevention that would save so many lives as simply to stop fluoridation, or don’t start it where it is otherwise going to be started. There you might save 30,000 or 40,000 or 50,000 lives a year, cancer lives. That is an awful lot of lives a year.“ Dr. Dean Burk Ph.D. (34 years at the National Cancer Institute). Judicial hearing, January 14, 1982.Safe Water Foundation vs. City of Houston, District Court of Texas, Harris County, 151st Judicial District, 80-52271
Finally a former politician who tells the truth
In this exclusive Press For Truth interview Dan Dicks sits down with Bill Vander Zalm former Premier of British Columbia to discuss his views on politics, the global elite and their end game agenda.
We have all heard the phrase “It’s a dog eat dog world” or this one”Good guys finish last”. If you acknowledge this to be true, you have to ask the question where do you think all the bad guys are, … Continue reading →